From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 10:35:22 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet  architecture
Message-ID: <199604100719.AAA16107@cygnus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 09:08 PM 4/9/96 -0400, Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> wrote:
>Of course that doesn't overcome the "technical problem" of getting the IETF
>to adopt that change in the protocols and getting a significant number of
>sites to adopt the new protocol.  Even if you impose a substitutte on the
>IETF, it doesn't stop them from wandering off and creating their independent
>protocols and seeing whether the "official" or the "unofficial" get adopted.

What, you mean requiring that Americans on an international standards body
bully the whole anarchy into accepting a technically inferior kluge
because some American politicians want it?  This ain't the UN...  or even ISO.



#					Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com, +1-415-442-2215