From: bryce@digicash.com
To: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Message Hash: 088ff39b800fca0f8fb8db935fb7cfab643e9d1017ecc441d22709b51bec1e6e
Message ID: <199605210815.KAA11605@digicash.com>
Reply To: <9605202045.AA00456@ch1d157nwk>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-21 12:27:34 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 20:27:34 +0800
From: bryce@digicash.com
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 20:27:34 +0800
To: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Subject: Re: Senator, your public key please?
In-Reply-To: <9605202045.AA00456@ch1d157nwk>
Message-ID: <199605210815.KAA11605@digicash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The entity knows as Andrew Loewenstern
<andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com> probably wrote:
>
> You can be sure that there will be rallying cries for laws to be passed to
> ensure the accuracy of statements made in key certificates, that characters
> are not defamed, that libel is not committed, etc... Lots of the same issues
> involving any other type of speech and the international and sometimes
> untraceable nature of the Net. What do you do about a signature on your key,
> posted anonymously to the net, which names you as one of the Four
> Horsemen(*tm)?
Hey, does that little symbol stand for "Timothy May-mark"?
I didn't know he had started laying claim to memes that he
helped propagate...
But back to the actual subject, I can't imagine that an
_anonymous signature_ will have any credence at all.
Regards,
Bryce
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2
iQB1AwUBMaF7g0jbHy8sKZitAQFZUwL/dq4oX/MXqvJFp/VGv5hIOpbawnz8oSnA
Vv5lIKperoZXg39ukzRjLRqzuursIlzeI23/aXSLRFKKZtVU/XFTeuZTor282aqB
n49lduz070amEZFLCwXCO3iSksk0Y3wv
=TGjr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1996
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”