1996-05-21 - Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable?

Header Data

From: Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>
To: sameer@c2.org
Message Hash: 0a66ae9c667dff47021ddfefd39a6680af323f6789f543b75c346aaa50fb5a0f
Message ID: <96May21.105344edt.20485@janus.algorithmics.com>
Reply To: <199605181841.LAA17739@infinity.c2.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-21 20:35:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 04:35:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Robin Powell <rpowell@algorithmics.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 04:35:48 +0800
To: sameer@c2.org
Subject: Re: Is Chaum's System Traceable or Untraceable?
In-Reply-To: <199605181841.LAA17739@infinity.c2.org>
Message-ID: <96May21.105344edt.20485@janus.algorithmics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>>>> sameer <sameer@c2.org> writes:

    >> 
    >> (On the other hand, I have had a longstanding faith that the system can be
    >> made to be both payer- and payee-anonymous. Moneychangers, for example.)

    > 	You don't need faith. You don't need moneychangers, even. You
    > just need to pay attention when Ian posts to cypherpunks.

I don't see how Ian's stuff allows this.

BTW, I went to school with him and will re-iterate what others have
said: he's a pretty amazing guy.  Didn't talk much, though :-) (this
was back at the University of Waterloo).

-Robin





Thread