1996-05-11 - Re: will the real Irving J. Schlublutz please stand up? was: Senator Leahy’s Public Key

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: brian dodds <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0d63cafe55e8f0a7166304b2533844948ad43e6a43888626e7e756155a118bbc
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960510225842.006e1618@popmail.crl.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-11 07:17:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 15:17:09 +0800

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 15:17:09 +0800
To: brian dodds <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: will the real Irving J. Schlublutz please stand up? was: Senator Leahy's Public Key
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960510225842.006e1618@popmail.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       SANDY SANDFORT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

C'punks,

>On Thu, 9 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

>i think a related point is one we all know well, that being if there is a
>will, there is a way.. we've seen it with phoney physicians and
>specialists, even, with certificates and physicians' licenses.. if someone
>wants to intercept corespondence and impersonate another person, it is
>easy enough if that person has the time and impetus.. 

When I was a teenager I read /The Great Impostor/, the 
autobiography of Fred Demara(sp?).  It was an eye-opener.
Demara posed as all sorts of people.  He didn't read any
books on the subject of identity, he just invented his own
techniques.  Because he was always learning, he was always
getting caught.  Each failure, however, just made his next
effort that much better.  Read it if you can find it; it's
facinating.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~






Thread