1996-05-22 - Re: Toastmasters?

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Message Hash: 15b7b611098dd6cb1e3a95dbfc920323c87435f5e870faf97aa295cadf77392c
Message ID: <01I4ZL1QWZX08Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-22 10:10:47 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 18:10:47 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 18:10:47 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Subject: Re: Toastmasters?
Message-ID: <01I4ZL1QWZX08Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"unicorn@schloss.li"  "Black Unicorn" 20-MAY-1996 22:30:15.23

>Ask every state which has such reporting requirements (which is every
>state in the union).

>If you wanted to form an offshore corporation you'd have to form an
>exempted one.

	IIRC, there was some discussion of some form of blind trusts a bit
back... it was used under English common law to enable stuff before the
actual invention of corporations. The ownership of the stock of such an
offshore company by one or more such trusts might get around such problems,
especially if the trusts had those (very interesting) flight provisions I
believe you mentioned a bit back.

>That would clearly change the analysis.

	RE: making a profit. Well, yes, it is a pretty good argument that
you aren't just going for lack of liability, since that's part of what
corporations are _for_...
	-Allen





Thread