1996-05-28 - Re: Remailers & liability

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: gbroiles@netbox.com
Message Hash: 16d55dc86e01db773c29f2769b2365634879a03cb207d45cc1f5c486ad52e911
Message ID: <01I57HT7DIPS8Y503M@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-28 00:13:44 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 08:13:44 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 08:13:44 +0800
To: gbroiles@netbox.com
Subject: Re: Remailers & liability
Message-ID: <01I57HT7DIPS8Y503M@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"gbroiles@netbox.com"  "Greg Broiles" 26-MAY-1996 19:38:38.36

>For what it's worth, I'm still planning to run a remailer again when I get
>settled down somewhere. (I don't think remailers do much good where the
>operator isn't root, so I'm not bothering with trying to run one on someone
>else's system.) My debt/asset ratio is bad enough from all of this school
>that I don't have much for anyone to levy against. Ha, ha. Anyone want some
>rapidly obsolescing computer and law books? :(

	Why, precisely, do you think that remailers don't do much good where
the operator isn't root? The possibility of the sysop looking at the mail &
getting the private key, the increased susceptibility to cracking of non-root
accounts, possible sysop non-cooperation in an honest manner (as opposed to the
first one), or what?
	Thanks,
	-Allen





Thread