1996-05-19 - Re: Reputation and anonymous companies
Header Data
From: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
To: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
Message Hash: 189f6bd86db7ede23d037dc989f061a53858e8a356150c1f339ff303b4927f25
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9605191444.A17180-0100000@netcom10>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960518200815.708A-100000@gak>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-19 19:41:19 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 03:41:19 +0800
Raw message
From: jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 03:41:19 +0800
To: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Subject: Re: Reputation and anonymous companies
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960518200815.708A-100000@gak>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9605191444.A17180-0100000@netcom10>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mark:
On Sat, 18 May 1996, Mark M. wrote:
> However, how would AP solve anything? If the company is completely anonymous,
> then nobody would know who to kill. Every worker including the president would
Do a textual analysis of everything the anonymous id that you want
terminated with extreme prejudice.
It will provide you with the information you need, to find
out the person's "real" identity.
xan
jonathon
grafolog@netcom.com
Thread
Return to May 1996
- Return to ““Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>”
- Return to “jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>”
Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”
- 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 07:33:58 +0800) - (Fwd) Mail Delivery Failure. - “Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>
- 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 13:32:18 +0800) - Reputation and anonymous companies - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-05-19 (Mon, 20 May 1996 03:41:19 +0800) - Re: Reputation and anonymous companies - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
- 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 13:32:18 +0800) - Reputation and anonymous companies - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>