From: Steve Reid <root@edmweb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1b9570abb13ace2b6d5ad8389877180ea064e56c97ce91c99222df0c8fbbf7af
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960520183838.350B-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-21 11:32:58 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 19:32:58 +0800
From: Steve Reid <root@edmweb.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 19:32:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Hiding remailers behind nymservers...?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960520183838.350B-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This 'middle-man' remailer... What does it really accomplish? Sure, the
operator is hidden, but that's only because of his/her nym at c2.org...
AFAICS, the 'middle-man' has just taken the liability off himself and put
it on the unhidden remailers. Why not just use the existing unhidden
remailers???
I think this is similar to the idea that came up about having some (but
not all) remailers only deliver to other remailers, for use as any link in
a chain except the last link. The operator doesn't have his email address
attached to spam, and there's very little liability because Co$ and other
pressure groups will always(?) go after the last remailer in the chain,
since that's the only one they can know was involved.
I think the pseudonymously hidden remailer is an interesting idea, but I
don't think it offers anything over the unhidden remailers, since it's
still depending on the unhidden ones.. If you want to aviod liability,
what's wrong with running a remailer that only delivers to other
remailers, as I mentioned above?
Am I missing something here?
=====================================================================
| Steve Reid - SysAdmin & Pres, EDM Web (http://www.edmweb.com/) |
| Email: steve@edmweb.com Home Page: http://www.edmweb.com/steve/ |
| PGP (2048/9F317269) Fingerprint: 11C89D1CD67287E68C09EC52443F8830 |
| -- Disclaimer: JMHO, YMMV, TANSTAAFL, IANAL. -- |
===================================================================:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBMaEhlNtVWdufMXJpAQEUbwf9F1081yRIazOUcr/z+ifihD5PLTr70V9X
zvp13QXvPVao5Jg1N83Tfrar7zQYnvHU2RYPVBLecxZAY0hhbRRhOF/GVhkfcm2g
ehNuQdTxilVTRbCez49zLpXxQEKvnullLYOZY3qv1xe9MaqjuS5C73c3H5oNhQTz
B79cdvLynsIrhXD5oLyZyUxX/fggsFIfQsAh6a1KAdC0OclF1/dm1WeJKADSMFq4
bBt5BZcd410tfwpy+VTD5TUt7tb2wAOv56tVKVcPIXPZ04hr4Nlww6pQ+dtR4/B0
j1lzfrdDxos6h33abB9TpKrfo8uBsGxlkGyefqre+qvfexZwv/Wpmg==
=sJVW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1996
Return to “Steve Reid <root@edmweb.com>”
1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 19:32:58 +0800) - Hiding remailers behind nymservers…? - Steve Reid <root@edmweb.com>