From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Message Hash: 24774b2739b00660038f0420f93f2d41dc04bee70524e8e95928b4d54ca04c76
Message ID: <01I4PAYQGM928Y5E3V@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-15 07:34:01 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 15:34:01 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 15:34:01 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Subject: Re: Fingerprinting annoyance
Message-ID: <01I4PAYQGM928Y5E3V@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"unicorn@schloss.li" "Black Unicorn" 14-MAY-1996 12:45:16.88
>It is one of the great advantages of the United States that no
>standardized procedure for person identification exists. Seals and
>certificates vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Cross the border to
>a state and a hospital birth annoucement is enough for a drivers license,
>cross again and 4 pieces and a note from mom isn't enough.
Are there any good reference works on how such requirements vary
between states? I know Loompanics has some works on the subject of identity,
but I don't know how reliable they are.
-Allen
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 15:34:01 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>