1996-05-12 - Re: distinctive properties of ecash, netbill, cybercash and iKP

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: Jüri Kaljundi <cypherpunks@toad.com, E$ mailing list <e$@thumper.vmeng.com>
Message Hash: 256c03fb7780fc0dcd29908a107c7574b049efbaf62aedef568cfe2bf877d8e6
Message ID: <v02120d06adbb39248694@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-12 11:02:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 19:02:41 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 19:02:41 +0800
To: Jüri Kaljundi <cypherpunks@toad.com, E$ mailing list <e$@thumper.vmeng.com>
Subject: Re: distinctive properties of ecash, netbill, cybercash and iKP
Message-ID: <v02120d06adbb39248694@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 16:40 5/11/96, Jüri Kaljundi wrote:

>This is one question why the central bank in Estonia (I am not sure about
>other countries) does not allow issuing e-cash here in Estonia. While the
>banks issue e-cash to people, they get some real cash from people.  This
>leads to actually doubleing the money in circulation, each monetary unit,
>either dollar or kroon, can at the same time be used by owner of e-cash
>and at the same time by the bank. The central banks are afraid that when
>the amount of e-cash in circulation gets big, this could lead to
>devalvation of money, especially a small country like Estonia is afraid of
>such development.

That's simply silly. The same argument would hold true for travelers
checks. Are Estonian banks allowed to issue them? I thought so.


Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread