From: bryce@digicash.com
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: 3711af2b330c3cbda471aec83f847eb6ef2ceba7ce34ddd6a4628981d4dca902
Message ID: <199605221708.TAA00752@digicash.com>
Reply To: <199605221614.MAA23436@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-22 22:57:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 06:57:45 +0800
From: bryce@digicash.com
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 06:57:45 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
In-Reply-To: <199605221614.MAA23436@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <199605221708.TAA00752@digicash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> It is true enough that *rates* can be stored as floats if you want,
> but never actual sums.
>
> Perry
That's interesting. Because rates never approach 2^23, and
because you never need that much precision with rates? It seems
like a bad idea to me anyway. Why not just use an Int32 if you
don't need that much precision?
Regards,
Bryce
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2
iQB1AwUBMaNKIUjbHy8sKZitAQFohwL/TnGoBAD2qi+zCf43FqhhPijFf6vNq3Ca
ddhNsCKQTML3V7MtQ7TkeMNZqSGexITkXqppxaiFY/uPLqz3b5NDv0JV7xl0bFh9
AiqS4vz1uxeBON5jCJXZI4Cu7HhDf0j0
=pmvp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”