1996-05-03 - Re: no-cost DH?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Message Hash: 3949b05571a27b63ca3fd1ab1e846a88ea0a2a6e09eddf1cd1256415f548a0cf
Message ID: <199605030048.UAA21799@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960501000301.3114A-100000@eskimo.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-03 08:28:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 16:28:23 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 16:28:23 +0800
To: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: no-cost DH?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960501000301.3114A-100000@eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <199605030048.UAA21799@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Wei Dai writes:
> Apparently Cylink is only licensing their SDK at no cost, not the actual
> patents.  Does anyone want to speculate on why they are doing this now?

To make as much money as they can in the short time they have
available.

.pm

Thread

• Return to May 1996

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
• Return to “Ted Garrett <teddygee@visi.net>”

• Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”

• 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 18:25:03 +0800) - Re: no-cost DH? - Ted Garrett <teddygee@visi.net>
  • 1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 18:40:40 +0800) - Re: no-cost DH? - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
    • 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 16:28:23 +0800) - Re: no-cost DH? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>