From: minow@apple.com (Martin Minow)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 52c22f58c1ceba82885a676cdd4b5f428ef8c4396dd237509f08a311e68ca775
Message ID: <v02140b03adaed70f48e8@[17.202.12.102]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-03 07:26:10 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:26:10 +0800
From: minow@apple.com (Martin Minow)
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:26:10 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: EET on PGP API Quash
Message-ID: <v02140b03adaed70f48e8@[17.202.12.102]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> ... the State Department is taking
> an increasingly hard line on PGP. Where once the State had
> restricted itself to warning developers against exporting
> source code with PGP file-encryption routines, it is now
> arguing that application programming interfaces (API)
> allowing PGP program insertion should be subject to control
> under arms-trading statutes.
It would seem that any computer system that permits the use
of an externally-supplied computer program (i.e., Windows,
DOS, MacOS, Unix, Java, Microsoft Word macro languange) would
fall under this restriction.
I wonder how much thought went into this decision.
Martin Minow
Return to May 1996
Return to “minow@apple.com (Martin Minow)”
1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 15:26:10 +0800) - Re: EET on PGP API Quash - minow@apple.com (Martin Minow)