1996-05-04 - Re: Why Leahy is No Friend of Ours

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 54cb4ac480f75e02b0afc5391f92aff0ccee04f6c436a818dcb143fe93c4cd07
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960503210515.6288A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <adaff858040210045a9e@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-04 07:53:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 15:53:20 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 15:53:20 +0800
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Why Leahy is No Friend of Ours
In-Reply-To: <adaff858040210045a9e@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960503210515.6288A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 3 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

[Well deserved irony lecture deleted]

> On your other points, we mostly agree.
> 
> I was just emphasizing the Senator Patrick Leahy pushed the bill that make
> the Surveillance State a reality. This should _never_ be forgotten.

Agreed.  I never meant to imply otherwise.

> 
> --Tim May
> 

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread