From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com
Message Hash: 57320b4267c28a63718373d2e2408862baf45065bbb69deff1606ffa7f5308fd
Message ID: <01I4ZNUW8BCQ8Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-22 10:25:51 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 18:25:51 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 18:25:51 +0800
To: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com
Subject: Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns
Message-ID: <01I4ZNUW8BCQ8Y5IL9@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com" 21-MAY-1996 22:04:32.30
>Heaven forbid that I use spammers as an idea base, but
>to borrow something from them.... Set up the headers
>on an anonymous message such that a Reply would result in
>the user automatically being placed on the "deny" list.
Automatically placing someone on the deny list from an email to
an address added to the _body_ would be a good thing, in this context, although
would mean having to have more than one email address for the remailer.
-Allen
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 18:25:51 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>