From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 05:24:26 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: Publicity on PICS
Message-ID: <9605100621.AA17939@rpcp.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 05:25 PM 5/9/96 EDT, you wrote:
>        The following may give an example of how companies and governments want
>PICS to be used, instead of how it should be used (market-based ratings not
>for censorship).

        It is _very_ confusing to follow though.
>>CompuServe, Microsoft, Prodigy and Netscape Communications will soon give
>>their customers software enabling them to block access to material they
>>judge objectionable on the Internet's Worldwide Web.

        Consider that Compuserve had a deal with SurfWatch, which was
incorporated in it "Internet" in a box, with a lot of Spry goodies. Now
Surfwatch has been purchased by Spyglass (a competitor or Spry). Also,
Compuserve offers RSACi services through CyberPatrols RSACi compliance (got
some weird derivitive and cross-liscencing works going on here!) and urges
its users and 3rd party people to use RSACi...
_______________________
Regards,       Men govern nothing with more difficulty than their tongues,
               and can moderate their desires more than their words. -Spinoza
Joseph  Reagle      http://farnsworth.mit.edu/~reagle/home.html
reagle@mit.edu      E0 D5 B2 05 B6 12 DA 65  BE 4D E3 C1 6A 66 25 4E