1996-05-12 - Re: Mandatory Voluntary Self-Ratings

Header Data

From: “Joseph M. Reagle Jr.” <reagle@MIT.EDU>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 5f150a0d8ee794831eb3501095c2e3d0e10149cd28855df1036f12db5ea894d6
Message ID: <9605121608.AA04469@rpcp.mit.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-12 20:23:02 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 04:23:02 +0800

Raw message

From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 04:23:02 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Mandatory Voluntary Self-Ratings
Message-ID: <9605121608.AA04469@rpcp.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:58 PM 5/9/96 -0700, you wrote:
>For every proposed "ratings" system that involves value judgments about who
>should see something, I can think of examples where a quite opposite view
>is held.

        Yes, but it is possible to have "descriptive" systems. Of course, to
make them easy, things are aggregated into groups, and these groupings have
a value judgement. But it is possible to have rating systems that don't tell
you diddley about who sees it. 
_______________________
Regards,       Men govern nothing with more difficulty than their tongues,
               and can moderate their desires more than their words. -Spinoza
Joseph  Reagle      http://farnsworth.mit.edu/~reagle/home.html
reagle@mit.edu      E0 D5 B2 05 B6 12 DA 65  BE 4D E3 C1 6A 66 25 4E






Thread