From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: bruce@aracnet.com
Message Hash: 677612d6ca69410afc630313af9f23c0507d6a0dc8f4e2a4193f31e6180291e1
Message ID: <01I59H7KD7P48Y5191@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-29 11:04:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 19:04:40 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 19:04:40 +0800
To: bruce@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: Philosophy of information ownership
Message-ID: <01I59H7KD7P48Y5191@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"bruce@aracnet.com" "Bruce Baugh" 28-MAY-1996 18:50:34.36
>A separate problem arises when the government compels the disclosure of
>information for one purpose - getting a driver's license, say - and then
>turns around and sells it to others. It's much harder to either negotiate a
>new contract or go to a competitor when the other party is a government.
Quite. A related problem is when the government generates some
information attached to you - the most obvious case being a social security
number. Should a private company (e.g., a credit bureau) be allowed to make
use of such? On the one hand, it would definitely limit companies not to be
able to... on the other hand, you were coerced into having that information
attached to you. One option is to have multiple possible SSNs for each person,
but that gets into the problem of the credit bureaus, etcetera, may not deal
with people who use a new SSN. It's their choice... but they're only able to
make that choice because of governmental interference.
-Allen
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-05-29 (Wed, 29 May 1996 19:04:40 +0800) - Re: Philosophy of information ownership - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>