1996-05-15 - Negative side-effect of the coderpunks split

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6bfda5a2619902014d2397c3adda10df0a859095db050eda378203f88a3189a5
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960514135114.773T-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <doug-9604141557.AA00094281@netman.eng.auburn.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-15 06:29:55 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 14:29:55 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 14:29:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Negative side-effect of the coderpunks split
In-Reply-To: <doug-9604141557.AA00094281@netman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960514135114.773T-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Ever since most of the hard crypto content moved to coderpunks, there have 
been a lot of totally non-crypto political postings that make my skin 
crawl. In general, the only thing that cypherpunks have in common is a 
belief that privacy is a good thing, strong cryptography is a good way 
to improve privacy, and that cryptography with _manadatory_ key escrow is 
not strong. Stuff on the CDA yes. Stuff on the CBA no. Use of crypto for
on-line tax filing yes. Generic Tax Evadance stuff not really.

I kinda miss the Perrygrams :)

-----
Cause maybe  (maybe)		      | In my mind I'm going to Carolina
you're gonna be the one that saves me | - back in Chapel Hill May 16th.
And after all			      | Email address remains unchanged
You're my firewall -    	      | ........First in Usenet.........





Thread