From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Message Hash: 6e195e19d4108b95016e0bef03509318a6c21c4e89d0614e859a24ef28be89ea
Message ID: <01I49ZPY3HNK8Y56P8@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-04 06:22:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 14:22:11 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 14:22:11 +0800
To: llurch@networking.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel
Message-ID: <01I49ZPY3HNK8Y56P8@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"llurch@networking.stanford.edu" "Richard Charles Graves" 3-MAY-1996 17:30:30.47
>Subject: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel
>ROTFL. From
>http://snyside.sunnyside.com/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/Library/Announcements/CyberAngels-Safesurf
>Special mention must go to an ongoing debate about anonymous remailers, which
>was an area where we were less informed. Thanks to an154280@anon.penet.fi
>for lots of very helpful suggestions. For those of you interested in the
>debate about anonymity we have two suggestions: firstly we have a HUGE FAQ
>on "Identity, Privacy and Anonymity on the InterNet", written by L.Detweiler,
>and if any of you want it, please write to us and ask for it (WARNING it is
>138k!) Secondly you can write to help@anon.penet.fi for their FAQ on their
>anonymous service, which is also very educational.
I had noticed that earlier, yes... see why I think they know less about
the Net than even _I_ do?
-Allen
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 14:22:11 +0800) - Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>