From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Message Hash: 6e476abcf4b6874d14cccd801de2a4a311f03def5746624aa2051f7187f4dbf0
Message ID: <01I4BJ3PYULW8Y53GG@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-05 04:23:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 12:23:51 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 12:23:51 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Kid Gloves or Megaphones
Message-ID: <01I4BJ3PYULW8Y53GG@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"shamrock@netcom.com" 21-MAR-1996 21:29:06.87
>It is true that the issuer is unable to discover that double blinding is
>being used. The real problem with the protocol is that it requires
>payor/payee collusion, which may make it difficult to execute.
Can the payee discover that the payor isn't colluding before the bank
can figure out who the payee is?
-Allen
Return to May 1996
Return to “Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>”