From: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 72bbe71043a5737d9bab34f3412698eebe4c62679c28243be656d2f24b773dac
Message ID: <01BB496C.7E658A60@blancw.accessone.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-25 05:02:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 13:02:41 +0800
From: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 13:02:41 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Truth can sometimes be harmful...(talk.cpunks.truth)
Message-ID: <01BB496C.7E658A60@blancw.accessone.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Sandy Sandfort
This is the most concise and logical response yet, to my
suggested answer of "Truth" to Bell's question. Blanc has
masterfully shown why that dog won't hunt.
...........................................................................
Thanks for the compliment, Sandy.
I understood what you meant. I appreciate the general nature of truth, in spite of the possibilities for misinterpretations of or prevarications from it.
Jim, a quote for you:
"We are able to act at all - that is to say, we have the power
to order our conduct in such a way that the ends we desire
can be attained - only because the phenomena of the world
are governed not by arbitrariness, but by laws that we have
the capacity to know something about. If it were otherwise,
we should be completely at the mercy of forces that we should
be unable to understand."
~ Human Action, Ludwig Von Mises
Substitute the word "truth" for "laws" and it makes equal sense. We would be at the mercy of forces that we could not control, if our perceptions and interpretations could not correspond to the actual, the real, the truth.
(and anyway, what does God have to do with crypto?
Never mind....)
..
Blanc
Return to May 1996
Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”