1996-05-23 - Re: The Crisis with Remailers

Header Data

From: bryce@digicash.com
To: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@pi.se>
Message Hash: 79b166841353113d27ce8665ab0c819af9763e8810ab5bd7e16df83274043ad4
Message ID: <199605231344.PAA29038@digicash.com>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960523122903.003b857c@mail.pi.se>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-23 18:32:40 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 02:32:40 +0800

Raw message

From: bryce@digicash.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 02:32:40 +0800
To: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@pi.se>
Subject: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960523122903.003b857c@mail.pi.se>
Message-ID: <199605231344.PAA29038@digicash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

 An entity known as "Matts Kallioniemi" <matts@pi.se> wrote something like:
>
> Sure, but we were really discussing Ecash(tm), not accounting. To quote
> from the FAPI:
> 
> /* An EC_Amount is a signed 32-bit integer.  It represents an amount 
>  * of money in units of the coinage's base value.  
>  */


Note "units of the coinage's base value".  The coinage's base
value could be 0.000000007 Lira if the bank so desired.
Unfortunately since the largest EC_Amount in the API is 2^31,
you wouldn't be able to buy much with coins of that type.  :-)
It is more likely that the coinage's base value will be 0.01
U.S. Dollars or 0.0001 U.S. Dollars or something on that order.


If a need arises for a greater range of values, the Ecash(tm)
API can be easily extended by using a larger int for EC_Amount.


Regards,

Bryce




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2

iQB1AwUBMaRrokjbHy8sKZitAQGeVAMAqKcDlnOlHH+HF98aK6M75AelWFMtw36z
tyRGlKp04jLtbmzL634ojoH+3zf+FyQvz+1pQCJw2sgkBChD0vsxomP/dqb2UXYK
RPEBjAchsw8TU4xuq/yunB4j4RNoru9q
=gNIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread