1996-05-25 - Re: ecash representation

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
Message Hash: 7fd54f0ac7ad82ab57a6716af1a28a2f672bb04037c2bdbf81cad8cd27429cbd
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960524132735.657S-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960524112822.657B-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-25 01:50:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 09:50:03 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 09:50:03 +0800
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: Re: ecash representation
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960524112822.657B-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960524132735.657S-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 24 May 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:

[...]

> Do you have a fact sheet on Piermont I might give to him?
> 
> He could be in a position to generate significant business for a
> consulting firm which really knew the ins and outs of strong encryption.
> 
> I'd also be interested for my own reasons.

This was not meant to go to the list, sorry everyone.

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread