1996-05-28 - Re: Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java
Header Data
From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Frank Stuart <fstuart@vetmed.auburn.edu>
Message Hash: 835877f2c14588f166ea1432cffebc5eea09e011960f96413392d10199385991
Message ID: <199605272346.TAA08318@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199605270739.CAA11092@snoopy.vetmed.auburn.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-28 03:31:27 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 11:31:27 +0800
Raw message
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 11:31:27 +0800
To: Frank Stuart <fstuart@vetmed.auburn.edu>
Subject: Re: Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java
In-Reply-To: <199605270739.CAA11092@snoopy.vetmed.auburn.edu>
Message-ID: <199605272346.TAA08318@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Frank Stuart writes:
> Sun is pushing SKIP for intranets and encrypting/verifying java applets.
If thats true, its a remarkably bad idea. The IP security layer isn't
anywhere near the layer where you should be doing things like signing
Java applets.
.pm
Thread
- Return to May 1996
Return to June 1996
- Return to “Frank Stuart <fstuart@vetmed.auburn.edu>”
- Return to “=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>”
- Return to “Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>”
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
- 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 18:12:08 +0800) - Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java - Frank Stuart <fstuart@vetmed.auburn.edu>
- 1996-05-27 (Mon, 27 May 1996 23:21:43 +0800) - Re: Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>
- 1996-05-28 (Tue, 28 May 1996 11:31:27 +0800) - Re: Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-06-03 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 01:48:35 +0800) - Re: Sun pushing SKIP for intranets and java - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>