From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Message Hash: 8506db825e9838d97fa45a17e27afecc75fb1ccd4d99db3608f5d7f70eb92a63
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960518113457.2985C-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Reply To: <claeSc600YUz0uOjMH@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-18 20:34:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 04:34:15 +0800
From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 04:34:15 +0800
To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: (legal) Re: CDA Dispatch #10: Last Day in Court
In-Reply-To: <claeSc600YUz0uOjMH@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960518113457.2985C-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 15 May 1996, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:
> Speaking of appeals, I've been thinking about what happens with the CDA.
> Okay, so we have two court cases going on, the Shea v. Reno case in NYC
> and the coalition lawsuits combined in Philly.
>
> What happens if the DoJ loses both the NYC and Philly cases and (as they
> said they would) appeals to the Supreme Court. Won't they take the
> weaker of the two cases, which is Shea's?
If they lose they are almost certain to appeal both cases. If they don't
appeal a loss, it means that plaintiffs won, i.e. get what they asked
for. The government isn't going to sit still for that while another case
is proceeding.
>
> And what happens if we win but Shea loses -- does the DoJ appeal in
> Philly and Shea appeals in NYC?
>
No problem with two sides each appealing different verdicts to the
supreme court. That's what it's for - to sort things out and make the
circuits consistent.
> If we lose, does our appeal automatically go to the Supreme Court? The
> language in the statute is unclear here -- it only specifices what
> happens when the law is declared unconstitutional. But if it isn't,
> can't the DoJ argue that our appeal should go to the Third Circuit
> instead?
Sorry, I don't recall the language well enough and I'm on the road. I
thought it went to the Supremes no mater what; that's the usual practice,
but i could be wrong. there is a procedure for by-passing the Court of
Appeal in urgent cases. Also, if one case is on a slow track and the
other one is on a fast track, there are procedures for getting involved,
at least as amici, in the fast track case.
[I am away from Miami from May 8 to May 28. I will have no Internet
connection from May 22 to May 29; intermittent connections before then.]
A. Michael Froomkin | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law |
U. Miami School of Law | froomkin@law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087 | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm there.
Return to May 1996
Return to “Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>”