1996-05-18 - Re: The Crisis with Remailers

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 900a7081c522e70dc198e1b437aafac40af6bf35696c399b48b7c6071d6c2715
Message ID: <BZs5ND7w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199605171738.KAA05800@netcom9.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-18 21:38:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 05:38:43 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 05:38:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
In-Reply-To: <199605171738.KAA05800@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <BZs5ND7w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com> writes:
> 1. there is no economic incentive.

So, add the code to mixmaster (and even the old style remailers) to
collect e-cash as it passes on the anonymous message. Then this will
be a good way to accumulate some e-cash, and a number of people will
try running remailers for this very purpose. Witness the recent
Usenet spam by someone advertizing a for-pay remailer.

> 2. there is no good way to deal with spams or other so-called "abuse"

Nor should there be.  What's one person's abuse is another person's
free speech.  Internet traffic should not be censored based on contents.

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread