1996-05-18 - Re: anonymous companies
Header Data
From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Message Hash: 985c8cdfc7af88189ad9e44c2860e751e0031f178c031b87466c5fd47e47f2d4
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960518012208.5178A-100000@eskimo.com>
Reply To: <199605171837.LAA09867@dns1.noc.best.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-18 13:55:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 21:55:34 +0800
Raw message
From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 21:55:34 +0800
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Subject: Re: anonymous companies
In-Reply-To: <199605171837.LAA09867@dns1.noc.best.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960518012208.5178A-100000@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 17 May 1996 jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
> In some businesses we can solve this problem by cryptographic control
> mechanisms, such as open books banking. In others, such as net startups,
> I see no solution other than increased reliance on personal individual
> capital.
I've seen the phrase "open books" used several times in the past on this
list. Can anyone explain what it means or provide some references?
Wei Dai
Thread
Return to May 1996
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>”
- Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”
- 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 02:19:00 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - jamesd@echeque.com
- 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 21:55:34 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
- 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 03:53:01 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>