1996-05-14 - Re: Mandatory Voluntary Self-Ratings

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9c0a85ecc3a01fa8178f6cfa4429b106b25332d0a7c82fb61e3d7b7305202e19
Message ID: <199605131648.JAA12444@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-14 02:12:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 10:12:59 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 10:12:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Mandatory Voluntary Self-Ratings
Message-ID: <199605131648.JAA12444@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:45 AM 5/13/96 EDT, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
>	the conservatives won't let people just rate
> "objectionable" material in order to keep it from them. They want it off the
> net/world whether or not it's rated.

In the course of channel surfing, I have once or twice come across
the Christians ranting about pornography.  They have both legitimate
and illegimate complaints, but mainly they emphasize the legitimate
complaint.  PICS addresses this legitimate complaint.

Should cut the volume down considerably, or else force them to drop
the hypocrisy, if indeed they are hypocrites.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread