From: loki@infonex.com (Lance Cottrell)
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: 9e6760e8085153bc8e0176f098ee3aa1412b3f391961744f66729c089b56a9fd
Message ID: <adabfc74000210044343@[206.170.115.3]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-01 05:33:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 13:33:27 +0800
From: loki@infonex.com (Lance Cottrell)
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 13:33:27 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust
Message-ID: <adabfc74000210044343@[206.170.115.3]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Look at the signators and judge for your self. When I look at the people I
trust through one level of introducer, I find I have a very high degree of
confidence in their identities. Two introducers out, it still looks fairly
good. I have not looked farther than that. It is the limit of my trust.
In many ways it is easier to establish the authenticity of a pseudonym than
a verinym. The only question with a pseudonym is whether the nym who posts
is the same nym who posted last time, and the time before that. If, over
the course of a year or two, there are no attempts to spoof the pseudonym,
then the key will have become well connected with the nym. That is all that
matters. Even if a "Sameer" has posted for years, I still have to worry if
the person's real name is Sameer (given the current understanding of the
meaning of a signature on a key).
I once refused to sign a key because I thought the driver's license was
forged, but I would be likely to accept a better forgery at authentic. I am
at least as confident of the identity of Uni as I am of many of the other
keys I have signed. The only ones I have more confidence in are those of
long time close friends, and family.
-Lance Cottrell
At 10:21 PM 4/28/96, sameer@c2.org wrote:
>> (Sigh). I'll say it yet a third time. Get a current copy of my key which
>> is signed by at least three people on the web of trust.
>
> As if this "web of trust" was actually worth something.
>
>--
>Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3
>Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734
>The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
>http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBMYZOkPPzr81BVjMVAQGwOggA1xZguRBMxrjZisk/3Imf4VKLzTr7wNaO
J5141lamYinHEnmvNZ9VTkq7kdkoTKw572RkC+tAeMI5PjAEOhxtbnRBMumVh7u6
wnxx1BD0Onka5r4M4avr8VFsPc2CYOicG5Yk33FJKuGT9JlSKgCOOeD8U5XQlbCD
8KGr6RPyYmEkKhEA3uhAE+vUjBN5ihCYglU+9U1wlRHX6bsS2gD3xjN2jaLCRcpv
vlPPGLrxQbxi7jVKOjXM6flTpYmjnV5gDLtEKMtpF08LsvL+t51NleDGCBmV7aBp
5xIpFvFb/PRyZpZa21yESrZ13Dx+0qOgXpXEFB3A3SPGWKFQGILm0A==
=sGly
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----------------------------------------------------------
Lance Cottrell loki@obscura.com
PGP 2.6 key available by finger or server.
Mixmaster, the next generation remailer, is now available!
http://www.obscura.com/~loki/Welcome.html or FTP to obscura.com
"Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly
it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night the ice
weasels come."
--Nietzsche
----------------------------------------------------------
Return to May 1996
Return to “loki@infonex.com (Lance Cottrell)”
1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 13:33:27 +0800) - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust - loki@infonex.com (Lance Cottrell)