1996-05-10 - Re: PGP, Inc.
Header Data
From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Message Hash: a30af0f48d7dd3f09727de753195aac35d80eb3684d0d4e652609a22463cb25b
Message ID: <01I4IHTM3WME8Y5BAX@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-10 17:12:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 01:12:57 +0800
Raw message
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 01:12:57 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Subject: Re: PGP, Inc.
Message-ID: <01I4IHTM3WME8Y5BAX@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"shamrock@netcom.com" 8-MAY-1996 11:06:21.74
>Since VeriSign is going to issue certs for nyms for free, the only
>requirement being uniqueness, using their certs might not prove much of a
>problem.
I can see some fascinating legal questions with what, exactly, a
VeriSign certificate obligates the company for. Digital signature laws should
get interesting - any application of this to the Utah one?
-Allen
Thread
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-05-10 (Sat, 11 May 1996 01:12:57 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc. - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>