1996-05-03 - Re: [RANT] Mr. Scruffy versus Mr. Neat

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Message Hash: a50f0db21abaabc7d1b0d2f6d725e30c622f7dc21f5744f5637e8ea127378f81
Message ID: <199605030025.UAA21735@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199605010408.VAA23530@netcom10.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-03 07:11:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:11:21 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:11:21 +0800
To: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Subject: Re: [RANT] Mr. Scruffy versus Mr. Neat
In-Reply-To: <199605010408.VAA23530@netcom10.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199605030025.UAA21735@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Mike Duvos writes:
> While Java is currently a scruffy invention and has yet to
> recieve the official blessing of the neats, there are a number of
> things that speak in its favor.

I would like to re-emphasize that given its design, Java was, if
anything, created by "neats". The problem is that its model requires
perfection to assure security, instead of conservative design which
assumes there may be design flaws and produces "defense in depth".

Perry





Thread