From: <>
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 15:10:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199605202103.OAA04342@netcom2.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


! With regard to the problems of remailers being shut down when we want
! long-lived addresses, wouldn't seperating the input and output be one
! possibility? That is (like Hal's Alumni remailer) you'd send mail to
! 'remailer@anon.ai' and it would be forwarded via a disposable account
! elsewhere. All messages would appear to come from 'disposable@foo.com' and
! if that account was shut down a new one could be opened to replace it
! while incoming mail simply backed up at the main remailer account. 
! 
! The only potential problem I could see would be that the disposable ISP
! might have logs which could track the outgoing messages back to the other
! account. You'd also obviously need to open the disposable account
! anonymously or using an ISP who'd protect your identity. 

That's silly.  The problem isn't liability but lack of popular
knowledge on setting up a remailer.  The more remailers,
the liability is reduced.

GOALS 2000: 2,000
QUT