From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a8e9a8468155a631918aa4fa0405bedefb1fe11863f03e9e46366549b50f5969
Message ID: <199605010257.TAA02118@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-01 07:21:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 15:21:16 +0800
From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 15:21:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: WhoWhere.com v. that stanford.edu loon
Message-ID: <199605010257.TAA02118@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Monday night, I wrote:
>I am confident that the Parsec folks are now acting in good faith, and
>that they are now sensitive to the relevant privacy and ethical issues.
[parsec.com = whowhere.com]
I may have spoken too soon.
I might be interested in talking, privately, with their venture capitalists
and allies, which include Netscape and InfoSeek.
I think if you want a service of this kind, those four11.com guys, who
started out with the SLED PGP key certification service, are absolutely
terrific.
- -rich
[not on cypherpunks -- no, not just because I'm throwing a tantrum; I'm
honestly embarrassed at my own behavior, and need a break.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMYbSd43DXUbM57SdAQGLGQP/WL/IWBM2rjpChUtn20T+iylKgtvqE3GT
nqs45S1M4YAV/0sQcbhjCr9ZDkyH60ei4VpORLaXy+J3EHkEFMO9j0KKGEU9nWAQ
T2R7YIIziWkQXDO92M08ezfXlT6hwRKCqf9VhfLl+PGEdBgVfAE2oS8exmQtEkF1
Td89ZQD+VT0=
=ddQ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1996
Return to “Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>”
1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 15:21:16 +0800) - Re: WhoWhere.com v. that stanford.edu loon - Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>