1996-05-14 - Re: Civil liberties of employees (Re: FYB_oss)

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu
Message Hash: aa50325110023e75a1e3970acc3f8e299f2446dfb6e2064bbfb96dcd0bebbe70
Message ID: <01I4OJI9UR748Y5BUB@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-14 12:03:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 20:03:25 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 20:03:25 +0800
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu
Subject: Re: Civil liberties of employees (Re: FYB_oss)
Message-ID: <01I4OJI9UR748Y5BUB@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"froomkin@law.miami.edu"  "Michael Froomkin" 14-MAY-1996 03:24:06.58

>On Sun, 12 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
 
>> Actually, one _does_ check one's Constitutional rights "at the door" (of an
>> employer), and the confusion over this issue is pervasively destroying real
>> Constitutional rights.

>Yes and no...and kinda no.

	Umm... you would appear to be discussing the current legal situation,
whereas TCMay was discussing what the situation _should_ be. In the limits
you discuss, the civil liberties of the _employer_ are being seriously
trampled upon.
	-Allen





Thread