From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: abd8c5c0a99c22c7c8f47062ed5f60d499cdae528f07d46a18731d9d4377c27e
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960521162219.006baee0@mail.aracnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-21 22:29:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 06:29:48 +0800
From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 06:29:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960521162219.006baee0@mail.aracnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 03:02 PM 5/20/96 -0700, Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com> wrote:
>My thought is to turn the block list concept on its head, and make it a
>"permit list". Simply, the remailer will only send mail to people who
>have voluntarily indicated their willingness to receive it.
On the whole, I like it. The problem comes when someone is trying
communicate anonymously with some other person who doesn't have a clue about
the whole thing. It would be neat to have soem way of generating a message
to the effect "Someone is trying to communicate anonymously with you. [short
explanation of good and bad uses of anonymity] If you would like to receive
this message, [instructions about permitting]"
Unfortunately, I don't know how one could separate those messages from all
the rest of the traffic.
--
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce
Return to May 1996
Return to “Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>”
1996-05-21 (Wed, 22 May 1996 06:29:48 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>