1996-05-05 - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: b977c1cd152fcf12b4cf4a19a09c02d09b6840c223689d757dfc9503ef2d2873
Message ID: <199605051818.LAA13734@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-05 22:27:53 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 May 1996 06:27:53 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Mon, 6 May 1996 06:27:53 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
Message-ID: <199605051818.LAA13734@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:53 AM 5/4/96 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> What Black Unicorn writes is quite
> correct IF ONE IS CONCERNED WITH LEGAL CORRECTNESS.

And if the IRS is concerned with legal correctness.

I note that a number of ingenious and popular tax minimization
gimmicks have in the end failed to benefit anyone other than 
their promoters.

When you need a pallet and a forklift truck to carry the tax
code, it does not matter much what the books say.

The more bits of paper you send the IRS, the more they know
about you.  The more they know about you, the more they can
shake you down.

Sending ingenious and unusual bits of paper crafted by a clever
lawyer merely alerts them to the smell of money.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread