From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Message Hash: bdc1cf3febbe27bd0123c8d3fb0ca856a481641f556ef532d7d018e4ec4e8480
Message ID: <01I4621DGYDY8Y50HU@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-01 07:24:31 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 15:24:31 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 15:24:31 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Calling other code in Java applications and applets
Message-ID: <01I4621DGYDY8Y50HU@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"shamrock@netcom.com" 30-APR-1996 08:43:38.24
>Presumably, such packages would have to be signed by Sun. Needless to say,
>these certificates would cost money. A potentially lucrative source of
>revenue for Sun. Nothing wrong with that.
Nothing wrong with that, no... as long as Sun isn't (as TCMay
speculated indirectly) pressured into not signing such packages if they were
crypto-usable. Does Sun currently do much business with the US Government,
particularly sections (e.g., the military, law enforcement and intelligence
ones) susceptible to being influenced by the NSA?
-Allen
Return to May 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-05-01 (Wed, 1 May 1996 15:24:31 +0800) - Re: Calling other code in Java applications and applets - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>