1996-05-23 - RE: CDT Policy Post 2.20 - Clinton Administration Floats Clipper III Draft

Header Data

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@MICROSOFT.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: bf0e4bb008665b047f513a87cb253a834ba6ab50d446d2233a6a397f59ade663
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-960522190514Z-17357@tide21.microsoft.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-05-23 07:03:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 15:03:10 +0800

Raw message

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@MICROSOFT.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 15:03:10 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: CDT Policy Post 2.20 - Clinton Administration Floats Clipper III Draft
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-81-MSG-960522190514Z-17357@tide21.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From the Proposal:

  "To participate in the network a user needs a public key certificate
  signed by a CA [Certification Authority] 
	
	which 'binds' the user's identity to their public key.
  
  One condition of obtaining a certificate is that sufficient
information 
  (e.g., private keys or other information as appropriate) has been
  escrowed with a certified escrow authority to allow access to a 
  user's data or communications."
......................................................................


Along with the escrow requirement, I keep seeing in here somewhere the
eventuality of a tie being established between public keys and a
national identifying scheme, possibly to update and replace the present
Social Security system.

    ..
Blanc







Thread