1996-05-29 - Re: Philosophy of information ownership

Header Data

From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ce7bfaa998c687753493c780d73a8249702ab153f9679fbf2a531704c0272120
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960528193842.00700704@mail.aracnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-29 00:59:33 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 08:59:33 +0800

Raw message

From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 08:59:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Philosophy of information ownership
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960528193842.00700704@mail.aracnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:29 AM 5/28/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:

>Contracts are the key.

Agreed. The more that can be explicitly spelled out about these matters, the
better.

A separate problem arises when the government compels the disclosure of
information for one purpose - getting a driver's license, say - and then
turns around and sells it to others. It's much harder to either negotiate a
new contract or go to a competitor when the other party is a government.

--
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce






Thread