1996-05-19 - Re: Rumor: DSS Broken?

Header Data

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Message Hash: cf71cf635c640bd5d3b8e7493180ead92256488d09cc68df756b59d521e172d2
Message ID: <v03006604adc4c3f96477@[199.0.65.105]>
Reply To: <199605190149.VAA18805@maildeliver3.tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-19 15:49:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 23:49:27 +0800

Raw message

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 23:49:27 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Rumor: DSS Broken?
In-Reply-To: <199605190149.VAA18805@maildeliver3.tiac.net>
Message-ID: <v03006604adc4c3f96477@[199.0.65.105]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 9:41 PM  -0400 5/18/96, Bill Stewart wrote:
> MD5 is at least weakened, maybe broken; there's an abstract by Hans Dobbertin
> that says something about generating collisions, and gives an example
> (though the abstract doesn't say how general the method is.)

That's what I get for not reading the DSS stuff when it came out. I'd heard
lots about the MD5 stuff, but I didn't put the two together.

It also looks like I'm behind in my reading.  Time to buy another edition
of Applied Cryptography...


Cheers,
Bob Hettinga

-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com)
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"If they could 'just pass a few more laws',
  we would all be criminals."    --Vinnie Moscaritolo
The e$ Home Page: http://thumper.vmeng.com/pub/rah/







Thread