1996-05-14 - Re: Fingerprinting annoyance

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: tcmay@got.net
Message Hash: d461adadf5fb9d6736916cbb09ff01c6bffd0326ac7e2647dcc9b9aee8c4dcef
Message ID: <01I4ONUV5GI88Y5D1N@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-14 14:59:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 22:59:32 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 22:59:32 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net
Subject: Re: Fingerprinting annoyance
Message-ID: <01I4ONUV5GI88Y5D1N@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"tcmay@got.net" 14-MAY-1996 04:46:37.08

>Trying to convince a company that photo ID badges and fingerprints are Bad
>Things is perhaps admirable, just realize that in a free society that
>employer is under no obligation to hire someone who refuses to go along
>with the company's security policies. (This relates to the "civil rights"
>thread.)

	While in general I agree, he never said it was a company. If it was
a government, for instance, I can see it as being ethical; the same for a
government-caused requirement (like the drug war nonsense) or a
government-supported company (like Airbus in Europe, or others supported by
tarrifs.) Since he didn't say, I forbode to answer (mine would have been
about like uni's one of superglue, although I haven't heard the needle idea
before.
	-Allen





Thread