1996-05-25 - Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable?
Header Data
From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: iang@cs.berkeley.edu
Message Hash: d64c417fff61d424e5ccb4cce8a95341c83d04e233be0928aa27e14be794c275
Message ID: <01I53GAYSQUC8Y4Z90@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-25 03:49:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 11:49:40 +0800
Raw message
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 11:49:40 +0800
To: iang@cs.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Is Chaum's System Traceable or Untraceable?
Message-ID: <01I53GAYSQUC8Y4Z90@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"iang@cs.berkeley.edu" 23-MAY-1996 13:56:31.71
>Ah. I see I was misunderstood. The goal was not to make the shop anonymous,
>but rather to be able to provide change to an anonymous payer.
I had thought that the basic purpose of the fully anon system was just
that - full anonymnity for payer and payee. Under your suggestion, the shop
gives up this anonymnity under these circumstances in order to be able to make
change. I'm not sure if I would call that a very good tradeoff...
-Allen
Thread
Return to May 1996
- Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
- Return to “iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)”
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”
- 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 11:49:40 +0800) - Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable? - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
- 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 16:24:13 +0800) - Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable? - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
- 1996-05-29 (Wed, 29 May 1996 10:07:57 +0800) - Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable? - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
- 1996-05-29 (Wed, 29 May 1996 10:18:32 +0800) - Re: Is Chaum’s System Traceable or Untraceable? - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)