From: “Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>
To: qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
Message Hash: da39f619236c0c8494dfa9b4b6e70638dd99d4dba955f5c7270f2eb217faff17
Message ID: <9605201823.AA00349@cti02.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-21 07:09:23 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 15:09:23 +0800
From: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 15:09:23 +0800
To: qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
Subject: Re: Virtual machines?
Message-ID: <9605201823.AA00349@cti02.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 20 May 96 at 2:32, Dave Harman wrote:
> ! Is there a way to have a remailer de-localize itself and
> ! relocalize itself over the internet?
> !
> ! For example, could there be several machines around the worlds
> ! that, when you send an e-mail to it, is routed to differents
> ! physical places of the world depending on where the actual
> ! remailer process is actually running? Could there be such a thing
> ! as a virtual machine runing a remailer that gets to hop from
> ! physical machine to physical machine around the world?
> !
> ! Just an idea to avoid jurisdiction problems.
> This is just what crypto remailers do.
> Public key encryption with To: 's encrypted at each hop threading
> through several servors.
Just to let you know: this is *not* what I meant. I did not speak
of the location of the message, but of the location of the
*remailer* itself.
DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee; Limoges porcelain, silverware and crystal
JFA Technologies, R&D consultants; physists, technologists and engineers.
PGP keys at: http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891
Unsollicited commercial e-mail will be proofread at US165 $/h
Any sender of such material will be considered as to have ac-
cepted the above mentionned terms.
Return to May 1996
Return to ““Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>”
1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 15:09:23 +0800) - Re: Virtual machines? - “Jean-Francois Avon” <jf_avon@citenet.net>