1996-05-23 - Re: FTC online workshop on privacy

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: declan+@CMU.EDU
Message Hash: dcf92232db085da6ec09b1f43a33d5b4e196fbad80d1249a7844ee39becda208
Message ID: <01I50KTHZCI88Y4X9G@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-23 05:23:40 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 13:23:40 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 13:23:40 +0800
To: declan+@CMU.EDU
Subject: Re: FTC online workshop on privacy
Message-ID: <01I50KTHZCI88Y4X9G@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


        It's unsurprising that some of the same groups backing the CDA are
backing this, since they used danger to children as an excuse for it. (A
rather transparent one, given the actions vs Compuserve). I am disappointed in
EPIC for cooperating with them.

From:	IN%"declan+@CMU.EDU"  "Declan B. McCullagh" 22-MAY-1996 17:46:10.71

>Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 22-May-96 Re: FTC online workshop on
>.. by Declan McCullagh@CMU.EDU 
>> The legislation being introduced at 10:30 am will restrict selling
>> mailing lists with childrens' names and other identifying info on them,
>> including email lists. Another attempt to regulate the net, or a good
>> thing?

>Whoops. I should have said the press conference happened at 10:30 am.
>The bill will be introduced in both houses later this  week.

>Interesting press conference. Enough is Enough! took quite a bit of time
>to rant about the dangers of the Internet. Pedophiles, chat rooms,
>illegal pornography.

>You get the idea.

	Quite.
	-Allen





Thread