From: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@pi.se>
To: ecash@digicash.com
Message Hash: e40f32404db5d2671b2d19214b8a6973773700587b4637ec27599642e5bdcd46
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960521135644.00354324@mail.pi.se>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-21 19:15:01 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 03:15:01 +0800
From: Matts Kallioniemi <matts@pi.se>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 03:15:01 +0800
To: ecash@digicash.com
Subject: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960521135644.00354324@mail.pi.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 15:34 1996-05-21 +0200, bryce@digicash.com wrote:
>Well how do we represent 0.01 U.S. Dollars in Mark Twain
>Ecash(tm)? Easy-- we take a few bits of data, interpret it as
>an unsigned binary number, and then say "this number is how
>many U.S. pennies this coin is worth."
Now we're back to pennies again. I was more interested in your
earlier claim of tiny payments, on the order of $2^-32.
>Actually it can sometimes get more complicated than that, and
>there are some details about how the forthcoming ecashlib
>handles this to be found at "http://www.digicash.com/api".
Will the api make it possible to create coins of arbitrary value? Is
the mint software (and the bank accountants) capable of doing
floating point arithmetic?
Matts
Return to May 1996
Return to “Matts Kallioniemi <matts@pi.se>”