1996-05-09 - Re: ecash payee anonymity, cpunk archives

Header Data

From: iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e707fffc3e38ec4ec34fd93860425caf7dd0c367f008b316449f31ef18bc61b5
Message ID: <4mr5ad$4ia@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199605072236.RAA02543@proust.suba.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-09 04:47:59 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 12:47:59 +0800

Raw message

From: iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 12:47:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ecash payee anonymity, cpunk archives
In-Reply-To: <199605072236.RAA02543@proust.suba.com>
Message-ID: <4mr5ad$4ia@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199605072236.RAA02543@proust.suba.com>,
Alex Strasheim  <alex@proust.suba.com> wrote:
>A while back someone posted a note saying that an ecash protocol
>garaunteeing payee as well as payer anonymity had been devised.
>
>Did that ever get posted here?  The last message I saw said that it would 
>be posted soon.

I don't recall if an "official" explanation of the protocol got posted here,
but it's being discussed in another thread (search for "moneychangers").

   - Ian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMZEYg0ZRiTErSPb1AQFHSwP8D+sHW+SXTWrnOmHEdgzU9+qYBjaHktjz
pdXIY6eQ+/vbnEdpLle04KYrJf1GA2l0Ind6CxiVwCX442bX4JLYvfoEEkieheJS
NVkDPWfT5rfItrznB49DJ5EC//QjQg8+AhUKLpfRFO0wxIMnTPfVfVkLZBQ820E0
3O0A5PkcfEg=
=AIhA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread