From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ea48a5489beb768e96802c335ed38355e88419c441fef60feb18523e2ece666b
Message ID: <199605180506.WAA03476@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-18 19:48:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 03:48:47 +0800
From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 03:48:47 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: anonymous companies
Message-ID: <199605180506.WAA03476@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 14 May 1996, Hal wrote:
> It might be interesting to make a list of all the problems people can
> think of why this idea won't work, paired with proposed solutions and
> workarounds - sort of a mini FAQ for this important (some might say
> ultimate) cypherpunk model.
Another interesting question is how you do personnel selection for an
anonymous enterprise. One possibility would be anonymous reputation
passing, but I don't know any protocols for this. A participant would also
want to take any positive reputation accruing away when the enterprise
finished. (And the rest of us would want any negative reputation to stick
as well.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The CDA means | Periwinkle -- Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506 | lost jobs and | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to May 1996
Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 03:48:47 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)