1996-05-25 - Re: VIRUS ALERT: Java virus that affects Netscape 2.0 & 2.01.

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Adam Shostack <perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: f709b6e83c020745f7d67c7242afe0279e04759ba47f353039aeaf865c0005d5
Message ID: <199605241748.KAA28206@netcom7.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-25 03:03:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 11:03:17 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 11:03:17 +0800
To: Adam Shostack <perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: VIRUS ALERT: Java virus that affects Netscape 2.0 & 2.01.
Message-ID: <199605241748.KAA28206@netcom7.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  7:45 AM 5/24/96 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
>        Hype about Java and a move to a policy based security
>mechanism are not incompatible.  Perry's security model will probably
>be NO Java, NO Livescript.  Mine might be only Java signed by McAffee
>can get more than 3 seconds of CPU time, or access remote network
>ports on the server it came from, no other code can run.

I would like to be able to enforce a policy for Java applet CPU time which
says, the applet can have as much time as it wants/needs constrained by:

(1) I can always determine how much it is using.
(2) I can kill it without killing other processes/threads including the browser.
(3) Without interfering with 1 or 2, I can set its priority in relation to
other programs running on my machine.

In the long term, I would like the ability to sell CPU cycles to Java
applets.  (Or donate cycles to projects I support.)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The CDA means  | Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506     | lost jobs and  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread