From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 09:56:30 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960504074319.21902A-100000@crl14.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960504175954.16238A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 4 May 1996, Sandy Sandfort wrote:

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                           SANDY SANDFORT
>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> 
> C'punks
> 
> I wrote in reference:
> 
> > > >Today, virtually anyone on this list can afford these techniques.
> 
> > Actually, I disagree with Mr. Sandfort on this one.
> > 
> > Taxation of International Income is a tremendously complicated field.
> > (You can get an LL.M. in international taxation alone for example).
> > If your simply looking to pick a jurisdiction, that's not so hard.
> > Neither is simply using a tax haven in simple ways or concealing skimmed
> > or cash assets.  Actually structuring an internatinal business endeavor is
> > a whole different ball game.
>  
> We don't really disagree.  What Black Unicorn writes is quite
> correct IF ONE IS CONCERNED WITH LEGAL CORRECTNESS.  Not everyone
> on this list could afford to do completely legal international
> tax structuring.  I still stand by my statement, however, that
> most list members could afford to use offshore techniques.  (If
> you have a ton of money, by all means, hire Black Unicorn or
> someone similarly situated, to help you with your planning.
> Big money is a big target, andy you definitely need to have all
> your i's dotted and t's crossed.

Agreed.  But for small "salt away" applications, the market is quite
available to all participants, however limited their resources may be.

I think I must have been reading you wrong.

>  S a n d y

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com